Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Beets. Neal <br /> <br />From: <br />~nt: <br />.0: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />J. Johnson [flipporecords@comcast.net] <br />Friday, November 12, 2004 3:24 PM <br />neal. beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />RE: Citizen Advisory Commission Survey <br /> <br />Nealt <br /> <br />I just returned from moving my parents up from Mesat AZ. Sorry I missed <br />the timing on this notet but thought I'd fill it out and send it along <br />at any rate. <br /> <br />Answers are after each question. <br /> <br />ThursdaYt October 28t 2004 <br /> <br />Members of Roseville's Citizen Advisory Commissions: <br /> <br />1. Do you think the size of your citizen advisory commission is <br />a. About Right? <br />b. Too Large? <br />c. Too Small? <br />Explanationt if you wisht about your choice above: Parks and Re creation <br />needs the diversity given by 9 member and one student. This number is <br />comfortable. <br /> <br />Do you think the length of your term is <br />a. About Right? <br />b. Too Long? <br />c. Too Short? <br />Explanationt if you wisht about your choice above: A two year term may <br />be more friendly for most folks. <br /> <br />3. Do you agree with a limit of two terms? <br />NOt I don't agree. <br /> <br />Or would you prefer no term limit? <br />No term limits. <br /> <br />Or would you prefer some term limit greater than two terms? <br />Explanationt if you wish: <br /> <br />I feel that the council would be excluding potentially valuable assets <br />by limiting the number of terms. It seems to me that shorter terms with <br />no limits would be a more asset friendly solution to the problem. <br /> <br />4. Regarding the reappointment processt do you think the City <br />Council <br />should re-interview sitting commission members who seek reappointmentt <br />and <br />~hen evaluate those sitting commission members for reappointment along <br />lth <br />new applicants for that commission position? <br /> <br />Sitting commissioners should be re-evaluated. <br />1 <br />