My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:39 AM
Creation date
2/16/2006 12:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/22/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 11/22/04 <br />Minutes - Page 9 <br /> <br />ACH Payments $67,595.41 <br />36954-37244 266,947.29 <br />Purchasing Cards 3,652.79 <br />Total $338,195.49 <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka, Ihlan, and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />4.b Approve Contracts/Purchases in Excess of $5,000 Approve Contracts <br />(Consent Item 3.b) and Purchases in <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned why staff had listed the Excess of $5,000 <br />Springsted billing on the request for approval of general <br />purchases and/or contracts exceeding $5,000 when it had <br />already occurred. Councilmember Ihlan further questioned <br />whether the Council would have approved this expenditure <br />beforehand, had they known how costly the report would <br />be, and in light of recent discussions. <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller noted that the City Council had <br />specifically requested the for the presentation as part of <br />their continuing research during 2003 and 2004 related to <br />numerous financial and economic development issues and <br />ideologies. Mr. Miller advised that the presentation had <br />served to assist the Council and provide a primer to outline <br />viable tools available to municipalities, along with a <br />risk/reward analysis for each of those tools. Mr. Miller <br />further noted that Council had requested a more definitive <br />and independent analysis, not as part of a specific <br />development. Mr. Miller further advised that staff had <br />secured the assistance of Springsted through a formal scope <br />of professional services agreement that included a <br />substantive written document, along with a two-hour <br />presentation to the City Council at a Council Study <br />Session, at which various financing tools were outlined, <br />compared and contrasted as they related to similar <br />developments as that being proposed in Roseville' s future. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing questioned staff s rationale for placing the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.