Laserfiche WebLink
Public Duty Doctrine <br /> The public duty doctrine precludes a negligence claim against a city. It states that the city does not <br /> owe a duty to an individual citizen when performing certain municipal functions,but to the public <br /> as a whole. Under this doctrine, even if the city may have done something that constitutes a breach <br /> of duty of care,there is no negligent claim available to the plaintiff against the city. Cracraft v. <br /> City of St. Louis Park,279 N.W.2d 801 (Minn. 1979). This doctrine has been applied to such <br /> activities as fire fighting and building inspections. <br /> Breach of Duty of Care <br /> In order to show a breach of duty, one must show that Definitions <br /> the city had notice. <br /> Actual Notice is when a city is <br /> Proximate Cause aware of dangerous or defective <br /> Was the city's negligence the cause or substantial factor conditions through complaints;the <br /> in the Plaintiff's injuries or damages? area has been recommended for <br /> repair or replacement;or other <br /> Damage or Injury accidents, injuries,or preexisting <br /> To establish the damage element,plaintiff must prove city created conditions. <br /> actual loss or injury. Plaintiff cannot simply speculate Constructive Notice is established <br /> or surmise as to his/her loss or injury. through evidence that the <br /> dangerous or defective condition <br /> Municipal Immunities was present for such a period of <br /> Cities have a variety of statutory immunities available time that it constitutes notice. This <br /> to them under the Municipal Tort Claims Act,Minn. exists if it can be proven that if the <br /> Stat. §466.01-15. Cities also have common law official city was exercising reasonable care, <br /> and vicarious official immunity available to them as a it should have known of the <br /> bar to suit.These immunities bar a lawsuit, even if city dangerous condition. <br /> is potentially negligent. <br /> Statutory Immunities <br /> The statutory immunities are set forth within the Municipal Tort Claims Act, at Minn. Stat. <br /> §466.03. The most common statutory immunities are: <br /> • Snow and Ice Immunity,Minn. Stat. §466.03,Subd.4 <br /> • Statutory Discretionary Immunity,Minn. Stat. §466.03, Subd.6 <br /> • Parks and Recreation Immunity,Minn. Stat. §466.03, Subd. 6e <br /> • Municipal Authorizations Standard Immunity(Permit),Minn. Stat. §466.03, Subd. 10 <br /> • Road or Highway Right-of-Way Immunity,Minn. Stat. §466.03, Subd.22 <br /> Snow and Ice Immunity,Minn. Stat.§466.03,Subd.4 <br /> This immunity is most often applied in slip and falls and automobile accidents where the presence <br /> of snow and ice was a contributing factor to the accident. The claim must be based on snow and <br /> ice conditions on public highway or sidewalk,which does not abut the publicly owned building or <br /> parking lot is necessary for this immunity to apply. <br /> 2 <br />