Laserfiche WebLink
extend the coverage of its self insurance to afford protection in excess of any limitations on <br /> liability established to law. Unless expressly provided in the ordinance or resolution extending the <br /> coverage,the statutory limitation on liability shall not be deemed to have been waived.. <br /> The Minnesota Federal District Court has held even if <br /> cities do not enact an ordinance or resolution indicating Learn More <br /> that they are self-insured or members of a self-insurance <br /> pool,if the evidence establishes membership in LMCIT or See Reimer v.City of Crookston <br /> other self-insurance pool,then the statutory tort caps are and Crookston Public School <br /> applicable unless expressly waived by the city. District#593,2003 <br /> 22703218(D.Minn. 2003)for <br /> The LMCIT policy documents more information. <br /> p y specifically state that <br /> although the city may have elected to purchase coverage <br /> in excess of the statutory limits [to cover non-tort or federal claims],the city has opted to not <br /> waive the tort cap limits. Thus,unless city expressly waives tort cap liability limits,purchase of <br /> excess or additional coverage will not affect the statutory tort cap limit. Please refer to the <br /> attachment entitled"LMCIT Liability Coverage Options, Liability Limits, Coverage Limits and <br /> Waiver" for complete discussion on these issues. <br /> Multiple Claimants and the Municipal Tort Caps <br /> 35 W Bridge Collapse Learn More <br /> On August 1,2007,the 135W Bridge spanning the <br /> Mississippi River near downtown Minneapolis collapsed, See McCarty,et.al.v.City of <br /> resulting in the death of 13 people and injuring over 100 Minneapolis,et.al.,654 N.W.2d <br /> others. 353 (Minn.App. 2002)for more <br /> information. <br /> The Minnesota Legislature deemed, "the collapse was a <br /> catastrophe of historic proportions...No other structure owned by the state has ever fallen with <br /> such devastating physical and psychological impact on so many." <br /> Since the state owned and maintained the I35W Bridge,it was the primary target defendant. <br /> However,the state was protected by an individual tort cap of$300,000 per individual claimant as <br /> well as a$1 million per occurrence cap. There was simply no way to adequately compensate the <br /> 179 claimants from that tort cap pool. <br /> To avoid a potential constitutional challenge to the tort cap <br /> Learn More <br /> limits and to attempt to provide compensation for the See Minn.Stat.3.7391-7394 <br /> victims of the I35W Bridge collapse,the Minnesota signed by Governor Pawlenty on <br /> Legislature enacted special legislation to deal with this May 8, 2008. <br /> tragedy. <br /> The essential terms of the bridge fund are as follows: <br /> • Non-liability based fund determined claimants didn't need to establish fault. <br /> • State individual tort cap retroactively adjusted to $400,000 effective August 1, 2007. <br /> 7 <br />