Laserfiche WebLink
493 <br />494 <br />495 <br />496 <br />497 <br />498 <br />499 <br />500 <br />501 <br />502 <br />503 <br />504 <br />505 <br />506 <br />507 <br />508 <br />509 <br />510 <br />511 <br />512 <br />513 <br />514 <br />515 <br />516 <br />517 <br />518 <br />519 <br />520 <br />521 <br />522 <br />523 <br />524 <br />525 <br />526 <br />527 <br />528 <br />529 <br />530 <br />531 <br />532 <br />533 <br />534 <br />535 <br />536 <br />537 <br />Member Gjerdingen questioned if levy funds were intended for reconstruction or <br />for maintenance needs. <br />Ms. Bloom clarified that it was basically a discussion of needs, with the City <br />currently performing 3 -5 miles of mill and overlay projects annually, requiring <br />significant dollars to perform that maintenance, and currently requiring the City to <br />dip into the PMP principal, diminishing its reserves. Ms. Bloom projected that <br />costs would only continue to increase, and questioned the status of those funds <br />would be within ten (10) years. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the City <br />the PMP. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted that <br />supporting assessin g constn <br />aware of <br />ng gap in <br />dual Commissioners <br />public pay for a portion <br />could also force them to <br />I arly 1980's when neighborhoods were <br />o , an <br />;tid unwilling to pay for them, creating <br />is in the future. <br />In conclusion, Ms. Bloom defined and clarified her direction from Commissioners <br />to facilitate further discussion: <br />• Get more information from the Cities of Richfield and St. Louis Park, as they <br />were more similar to the City of Roseville; <br />Page 12 of 13 <br />