Laserfiche WebLink
*MTCE (Metric tons of carbon equivalent) and MTCOiE (Metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions) are <br />figures commonly used when discussing greenhouse gas emissions. <br />What do all these numbers mean? <br />The numbers above help municipalities calculate and track their environmental footprint. For <br />more information about the process of measuring the environmental benefits of waste reduction, <br />visit httn: / /el2a.gov /climatechange /wvcd /waste /measureghg.html #click. <br />These numbers, however, don't have much meaning to the average person. To help recyclers <br />understand the significance of their actions, the EPA has also developed tools to translate these <br />numbers into equivalent examples that people can more easily understand. <br />• For example, using the figures above, the EPA estimates that Roseville would have had to <br />remove 1,574 cars from the road for one year to have had the same environmental impact <br />in 2011 as they did recycling. To achieve this, over 10% of Roseville's households would <br />have had to give up one car for a year. <br />• Another example of how these efforts can be translated into energy savings can be found <br />in the EPA calculator. It shows that the energy savings gained by the recycling efforts of <br />Roseville's residents in 2011 could power 418 homes for one year (over 2.5% of <br />households). <br />Although WARM is the most widely peer - reviewed and accepted model, it is considered to have <br />several flaws. Many believe the use of this calculator is conservative and understates the real <br />impact of waste reduction efforts. However, despite these flaws, WARM is a well recognized, <br />published calculator. Until a better calculator is peer - reviewed and accepted, WARM gives us a <br />conservative starting place to measure these impacts and work towards our goals. Even with <br />WARM, the impacts are quite significant. <br />(http: / /el2a.gov /climatechange /wvcd /waste /calculators /Warm Form.html) <br />10 <br />Total Recycling <br />Carbon Equivalent <br />Carbon Dioxide <br />Reduction <br />Equivalent Reduction <br />2006 <br />3,441 tons <br />2,328 metric tons <br />8,537 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />2007 <br />3,682 tons <br />2,460 metric tons <br />9,018 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />2008 <br />3,556 tons <br />2,383 metric tons <br />8,736 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />2009 <br />3,281 tons <br />2,206 metric tons <br />8,090 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />2010 <br />3,322 tons <br />2,303 metric tons <br />8,443 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />2011 <br />33244 tons <br />2,190 metric tons <br />8,030 metric tons <br />(MTCE *) <br />(MTCO E) <br />*MTCE (Metric tons of carbon equivalent) and MTCOiE (Metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions) are <br />figures commonly used when discussing greenhouse gas emissions. <br />What do all these numbers mean? <br />The numbers above help municipalities calculate and track their environmental footprint. For <br />more information about the process of measuring the environmental benefits of waste reduction, <br />visit httn: / /el2a.gov /climatechange /wvcd /waste /measureghg.html #click. <br />These numbers, however, don't have much meaning to the average person. To help recyclers <br />understand the significance of their actions, the EPA has also developed tools to translate these <br />numbers into equivalent examples that people can more easily understand. <br />• For example, using the figures above, the EPA estimates that Roseville would have had to <br />remove 1,574 cars from the road for one year to have had the same environmental impact <br />in 2011 as they did recycling. To achieve this, over 10% of Roseville's households would <br />have had to give up one car for a year. <br />• Another example of how these efforts can be translated into energy savings can be found <br />in the EPA calculator. It shows that the energy savings gained by the recycling efforts of <br />Roseville's residents in 2011 could power 418 homes for one year (over 2.5% of <br />households). <br />Although WARM is the most widely peer - reviewed and accepted model, it is considered to have <br />several flaws. Many believe the use of this calculator is conservative and understates the real <br />impact of waste reduction efforts. However, despite these flaws, WARM is a well recognized, <br />published calculator. Until a better calculator is peer - reviewed and accepted, WARM gives us a <br />conservative starting place to measure these impacts and work towards our goals. Even with <br />WARM, the impacts are quite significant. <br />(http: / /el2a.gov /climatechange /wvcd /waste /calculators /Warm Form.html) <br />10 <br />