Laserfiche WebLink
263 <br />264 <br />265 <br />266 <br />267 <br />268 <br />269 <br />270 <br />271 <br />272 <br />273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 <br />300 <br />301 <br />302 <br />303 <br />304 <br />305 <br />306 <br />307 <br />308 <br />Chair thanked presenters for their attendance and their informative presentation. <br />Recess <br />Chair DeBenedet recessed the meeting at approximately 7:40 p.m. and reconvened at <br />approximately 7:45 p.m. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that, staff -level di <br />for assessments on roadways not A <br />County or State of MN). <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that discussions <br />expectations in the future reasi <br />jurisdictions. <br />At the request of Chair DeBe t to mar mparisons as provided in <br />Attachment m prov a b out, ached hereto and made <br />apart her d en "Sped en ey Spreadsheet — 2010 <br />(Market Cit tro Po tion be 50 000 and 100,000)." <br />Ms. ooNevieAd the cu mm and discussion among staff and <br />Commissi uded: furthe i s for Minnesota State Aid (MSA) <br />funding frconstruction for quired 48' wide, 9 ton roadway to <br />a menions based on a 32' wide, 7 ton street, with the City picking up <br />the ional construction costs. <br />Chair DeBI <br />source also <br />if MSA funds were not available, another funding <br />znd to facilitate those construction costs. <br />Further discussion ncluded remaining sections of roadway (e.g. frontage roads) <br />classified as "non- permanent" estimated at two (2) miles remaining; and <br />challenges for them as they were "single- loaded," but their reconstruction costs <br />would be much higher than that. <br />Mr. Schwartz opined that, given rising expectations for other jurisdictions and <br />local cost participation, assessment costs would need to be revised and increased. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted the City of Roseville's placement at the low end of <br />assessment policy comparisons from the survey provided for metropolitan <br />communities with populations between 50,000 and 100,000, compiled in 2010. <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />