Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JAN-06-2003 14:22 <br /> <br />RATWIK ROSZAK MALONEY <br /> <br />6123390038 <br /> <br />P.07 <br /> <br />RATWIK, ROSZAK & MALONEY, P..A.. <br />Attcrneys at Law <br /> <br />(612) 339-0060 <br />Fax (612) 339-0038 <br />www.ratwiklaw.com <br /> <br />Erin K. Munson <br />Shannon M. Magill <br />Mark 1. Girouard <br />Eric 1. Quiring <br />Stacey L. Wilson <br />Sonya J. Guggemos <br /> <br />Paul C. Ratwik <br />John M. Roszak <br />Patricia A. Maloney* <br />Terrence J. Fo~ <br />Stephen G. Andersen** <br />Scott T. Anderson <br />Kevin J. Rupp <br />Jay T. Squires*t <br />Ann R. Goering <br />Nancy E. Blumstein* <br />Joseph 1. Langel <br />Michael 1. WaldsplU'ger* <br />Margaret A. Skelton <br />Amy E. Mace <br /> <br />300 U.S. Trust Building <br />730 Second Avenue South <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 <br /> <br />1\1 Also admitted in Wisconsin <br />H Civil Trial Specialist <br />Certified by the Minnesota <br />State Bar Assodation <br />t Real Property Law Specialist <br />Certified by the Minnesota <br />State Bar Association <br /> <br />January 6, 2002 <br /> <br />Mr. Neal Beets <br />City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> <br />Roseville\l ~ 55113-1899 <br /> <br />RB: Use City Facilities for Public Meetings <br />Our File No. 4002(1)-0024 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Beets: <br /> <br />You recently asked for our opinion regarding the following situation: <br /> <br />FACTS <br /> <br />On August 22, 2002, the Roseville Citizens Council for Fair and Open Government <br />(RCCFOG) held a press conference in the City Council Chamber. After this press conference, <br />the Roseville City Council voted 3 to 2 on October 21, 2002 to restrict public use of the City <br />Council Chamber to government-related business during business hours. This action did not <br />affect the City's Park and Recreation Department policy regarding the use of other city <br />facilities by outside organizations. <br /> <br />In a separate incident, a Roseville resident attended a meeting of RCCFOG in <br />December, 2002. The meeting was held at the Oval~ a city-owned location used for public <br />meetings. The RCCFOG was using the meeting room, per City Facility Use policy, at no cost. <br />It is our understanding that the resident was asked to leave the meeting because she was not a <br />member of the group, and was also told by the chairman of the RCCFOG that she could not <br />join the group. <br />