My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0428
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:38 AM
Creation date
3/8/2006 11:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/28/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 4/28/03 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />Roseville and the number of deviations in setbacks <br />due to original township and county zoning acts prior <br />to Roseville becoming a city; with exceptions to <br />those homes built prior to the City's incorporation. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn concurred that the decision <br />before the Council was a difficult one, but addressed <br />the duties of the City Council in making these <br />determinations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Klausing addressed the Council and <br />audience from the podium to display a proposed <br />alternative site plan in an attempt to alleviate the <br />proposed building's mass on the north side. <br /> <br />Jill and Brian Bean, applicants, came to the <br />podium and expressed appreciation for the idea, but <br />that it had been eliminated due to the load-bearing <br />walls on that side of the home, and the increased <br />impact to the proj ect' s overall cost. <br /> <br />Mr. and Mrs. Bean reviewed numerous informational <br />materials in support of the project as proposed and <br />other options that they had investigated to lessen the <br />visual impact and setback issues. <br /> <br />Discussion items included other location options for <br />the garage, whether attached or detached; screening <br />options to break up the view; and the flexibility of <br />the applicants to viable solutions other than that <br />presented. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn called for the comments from the <br />neighboring property owner and other audience <br />members. <br /> <br />Daniel Gruntner, 1768 Dunlap (directly north of <br />the variance site) <br />Mr. Gruntner provided a bench handout listing what <br />he opined were the negative and positive impacts of <br />the proj ect for the Ci ty, Precinct 9, the Dunlap <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.