My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0428
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:38 AM
Creation date
3/8/2006 11:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/28/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 4/28/03 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />not being viable for consideration for a cell tower <br />due to height or size of the buildings. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch reviewed preferences of the City for <br />monopole use as functioning light poles for a dual <br />purpose. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn expressed his preference for <br />consolidation of the towers. <br /> <br />Mr. Coleman addressed Mayor Kysylyczyn's <br />concerns and Qwest's first choice preferences for <br />placement on water towers. Mr. Coleman further <br />advised that their original plan was to put the <br />equipment behind existing natural screening, as per <br />the original agreement Frank's Nursery. However, <br />the Planning Commission had requested the revised <br />plan as presented, to preserve a tree that would have <br />needed to be removed during the construction <br />process. Qwest had redesigned their plan, in <br />accordance with the Planning Commission's request <br />for cedar fencing, but Frank's Nursery's lender was <br />not in favor of removing any existing parking places <br />and had requested the equipment to be located in the <br />grassy area and screened on all sides by trees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka asked for clarification <br />regarding the type and size of the planned <br />replacement tree(s). <br /> <br />Mr. Coleman advised that only one Evergreen tree <br />would need to be removed in order to allow <br />servicing of equipment; and that in order to install <br />the coax cables, the roots would probably be <br />damaged and it wouldn't survive anyway. It was the <br />applicant's intent to replace that tree with a tree of a <br />similar size to the adjacent trees on the site. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka sought further clarification <br />regarding the screening fence materials and color; <br />square footage of proposed equipment and future <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.