My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:54 AM
Creation date
3/8/2006 12:28:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/2/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 6/02/03 <br />Page 20 <br /> <br />auction on cars depending on their condition; monies <br />realized on sales being deposited in the City's General <br />Fund; indoor housing of vehicles during evidence <br />collection and reconstruction of accident scenes, as well <br />as for insurance purposes. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included actual site-specific <br />construction cost estimates; minimal cost variations in dry <br />or wet sprinkler systems for the underground garage; and <br />energy code requirements regarding not heating the <br />underground garage. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn provided an overhead slide providing <br />an outline of those various communication methods and <br />dates used pre-referendum by staff and Councilmembers <br />in keeping the public informed; and attempted to dispel <br />the rumor that the project's scope is not in line with that <br />presented to the public for the referendum. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that Ankeny Kell had <br />served the City well in analyzing all options and <br />expressed his confidence in their expertise. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka asked City Attorney Squires to <br />clarify the flexibility of legal options as to the referendum <br />and changes to the proj ect. <br /> <br />City Attorney Squires responded that the bond <br />referendum language was the determining factor and the <br />language was usually broad enough to allow for <br />contingent flexibility within that scope; with the voters <br />having elected Councilmembers to represent them and <br />make determinations on their behalf. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka asked City Attorney Squire's <br />opinion as to whether the Council had deviated from the <br />proposed scope of the proj ect by incorporating the Public <br />Works, Public Safety and Information Technology <br />Departments. <br /> <br />City Attorney Squires opined that the details under <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.