My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:54 AM
Creation date
3/8/2006 12:28:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/2/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 6/02/03 <br />Page 24 <br /> <br />to be heard on this process; <br />2) The intent of the Council's deliberation regarding <br />issuance of a citation was not for the purpose of <br />assigning guilt, but an effort to move forward with a <br />sensible process; and opined that judges prefer not to <br />have these items presented in their courtrooms, and he <br />would not be supporting a motion to proceed. <br /> <br />Dennis Guptil, owner of 185 North McCarrons <br />Boulevard West <br />Mr. Guptil advised Councilmembers that he had <br />originally purchased the property with the intent of <br />removing the physical structures from the property to <br />allow for new construction. Mr. Guptil stated that, in his <br />discussions with Planning staff several years ago, he had <br />met with considerable resistance from the Watershed <br />District due to the pond behind the house, making it cost <br />prohibitive to develop the property. Mr. Guptil <br />apologized for wasting time in correcting code violations, <br />but stated that most findings in the staff report had been <br />remedied; and commented that if the Council is <br />discussing condemnation, it must mean that the City has <br />its own development plans for the property. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn responded that the City utilized <br />numerous tools in handling properties that are <br />substandard, and encouraged Mr. Guptil to demolish the <br />structures on his own, that the City only wanted the <br />property problems corrected, and had no intent, to his <br />knowledge, of acquiring the property for development. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn questioned Community Development <br />Director Welsch on staff s preference and advice on <br />proceeding at this point; and given the housing nature of <br />the issue, questioned the validity of referring the situation <br />to the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br />(HRA) . <br /> <br />Community Development Director Welsch advised it was <br />staff s intent to resolve the problem, with no particular <br />preference for the method in doing so; and concurred that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.