My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0319
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2012 12:19:31 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 12:15:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/19/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 19,2012 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Mr. Schwartz responded that he thought such a permit requirement could be im- <br /> plemented by City Council policy; and advised that he would need to research in- <br /> formation on the number of permits for service lines on an annual basis, while <br /> opining that there were quite a few pulled, especially for major renovations. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that even with a back flow device installed, if homeowners or <br /> businesses don't keep the lines well-maintained, there was still a potential for <br /> claims. <br /> Mr. Schwartz concurred, noting that an access port was needed — through man- <br /> hole or vault — with any such type installation; and the potential for them to be- <br /> come blocked was still possible. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced her research on such devices, whether in- <br /> stalled inside or outside, and the need for a well pit similar to a sump pump pit to <br /> access the main preventer, creating a rather significant effort and, cost. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee sought clarification on whether City Code allows an outside <br /> pit or not versus MN Plumbing Codes. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that he did not have that information readily at hand. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted the deterrents for a sump pump if it was pumped <br /> out into the yard. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it was worse yet if the sump pump was connected to the <br /> storm sewer. <br /> Councilmember Pust questioned if the City of Fridley had any different experi- <br /> ence with LMCIT claim payouts since they, as a city, put money into it, and <br /> whether the LMCIT looked at those claims any differently; and further questioned <br /> if the City of Fridley participated in the no-fault coverage offered by the LMCIT. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that he was not aware of any difference in claim review; <br /> and advised that the City of Fridley did not have the no-fault coverage with the <br /> LMCIT. Mr. Schwartz advised that he was still clarifying if claims paid up on <br /> properties cleaned up went against the City's aggregate deductable, with the <br /> City's Finance Department indicating that it did so. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced policy rates for homeowners against such a <br /> sewer back-up, however, she noted that it appeared to be widely variable; and that <br /> may not include a 100-year wheather event such as the one experienced here in <br /> July of 2011. Councilmember McGehee noted that the National Weather Bureau <br /> information upon which these events are based has not been updated since 1961 <br /> due to a lack of funds and staff at the federal level. However, as the weather con- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.