My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:35:28 AM
Creation date
4/3/2006 10:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 03/20/06 <br />Minutes - Page 18 <br /> <br />employee flexibility and to encourage better employee <br />management and a sense of ownership of PTO; and providing an <br />incentive for honesty with PTO. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust requested that staff seek the City Attorney <br />review and opinion on the proposed plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested the additional information <br />provided by staff include a quick summary of reasons why this is <br />a good thing from an employee and an employer perspective, and <br />the advantages and disadvantages for both entities. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to provide additional information to the City <br />Council based on tonight's discussion. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Discuss Council Budgeting Process <br />Finance Director Chris Miller advised that the internal staff <br />2007 budgeting process would begin in April. Mr. Miller sought <br />early guidance for Council preference for the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller reviewed the traditional process in determining an <br />acceptable percentage increase and allocating funds <br />proportionally to existing programs and services; and the <br />previously discussed alternative option, as outlined by City <br />Manager Beets at an earlier meeting, for budgeting for outcomes. <br />Mr. Miller reviewed the steps necessary for such an alternative: <br />1) Setting the price of government; <br />2) Setting the priorities of government; <br />3) Pricing the priorities and allocating available resources; <br />and <br />4) Developing a purchasing plan for each result. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller detailed the various steps with this alternative; and <br />provided a graph depicting the price of government in Roseville <br />over the past ten years using that calculation method (per-capita <br />revenue received divided by per-capita income). <br /> <br />Mr. Miller noted that not all City's programs and/or services <br />could be evaluated and "bid-out" at the same time; and that steps <br />would need to be taken to ensure that legally restricted funds <br />were used in the manner in which they had been prescribed. Mr. <br /> <br />Council Budgeting <br />Process <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.