My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:35:28 AM
Creation date
4/3/2006 10:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Klausing's claims; and the corrections <br /> <br />Claim #1: Mr. Klausing claims that the procedure is a result of the difficulties <br />council members previously encountered placing items on the agenda. <br /> <br />Correction #1: The policy predates any imagined difficulties claimed by Mr. <br />Klausing. The policy of allowing council members to place items on the agenda <br />was instituted in January 2002 on a 3-2 vote with Mr. Klausing and Mr. Maschka <br />voting no. <br /> <br />With the election of Mr. Kough and Mr. Schroeder in 2002, there was a <br />substantial shift in the council's thinking on this issue. The council felt that this <br />meeting was the council's meeting, not the manager's meeting. There was also <br />a feeling that since members were independently elected and had different <br />opinions and goals, those members had an inherent right to raise items at <br />meetings for discussion without receiving prior approval by other members. <br /> <br />The noon Wednesday administrative policy was adopted soon thereafter, <br />because staff indicated frustration with members who would create extra work by <br />trying to place items on the agenda during the assembly process. <br /> <br />Claim #2: Mr. Klausing's difficulty of placing items on the agenda is the fault of <br />actions by Mayor Kysylyczyn. <br /> <br />Correction #2: The difficulty Mr. Klausing refers to in his memo was of his own <br />making. He refused to follow the system and attemptedto submit an item after <br />the Wednesday noon administrative deadline. When he- was told he would have <br />to wait olJeweek, he had _Mr. Beets prepare a second agenqa for the meeting <br />with his::items. The councikresolved the issue 'several :days tater by setting ast.de: . . <br />Mr. Klausi~g's agenda, asking ~im to wait one week, and req~esting that he <br />follow the system in place. The fact that Mr. Klausing failed to mention is that his <br />agenda requests were to call yet another vote on some items which had been <br />voted down several times in the past. <br /> <br />Claim #3: Mr. Klausing's claims that the council agenda policy is connected to <br />goal setting and was intended to be used by staff to place items on the agenda. <br /> <br />Correction #3: The council agenda policy process passed in 2002, council goal <br />setting sessions, and staff initiated agenda items, are three separate distinct <br />issue? The three were never connected. <br /> <br />Mr. Klausing's description of the process, staff leading the council on policy <br />issues, was the old process prior to 2002. The council agenda policy passed in <br />2002 was a way to break the previous system of the tail wagging the dog. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.