My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:35:28 AM
Creation date
4/3/2006 10:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Claim #9: Mr. Klausing raises the issue that members can place items on the <br />agenda consecutive times, despite the council having addressed the item <br />previously. <br /> <br />Correction #9: It was Mr. Klausing who started this practice in 2002. On a 3-2 <br />vote, he got permission from the council to submit items for the agenda, <br />regardless of how many times they had been previously voted down. <br /> <br />Claim #10: Mr. Klausing claims that council and staff do not have enough time <br />to examine items under the current process. <br /> <br />Correction #10: Council and staff have no responsibility to examine items that <br />council members place on the agenda. The responsibility for presenting <br />supporting information on a council initiated agenda item rests fully with the <br />council member. It defies common sense to examine an item which lacks <br />significant support. It defies common sense to spend staff resources on an item <br />which lacks significant support. When the item comes before the council, <br />members can discuss the issue, table it for more information, or permanently <br />table it. <br /> <br />I , ~. _ . . ~ : <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.