My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0616
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 1:54:00 PM
Creation date
4/4/2006 11:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/16/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Minutes - 06/16/03 <br />Minutes -Page 24 <br />Sylvia Sieferman, 420 Terrace (Applicant) <br />Ms. Sieferman expressed her sadness at the reaction of her <br />neighbors; that the variance request was not about what <br />the neighbors appeared to be concerned about; and opined <br />that it was her neighborhood as well. <br />Ms. Sieferman addressed the various concerns of the <br />neighborhood that she and her architect had already <br />addressed in designing the proposed addition, including <br />drainage, tree removal, and her moving forward in <br />working with staff and the Planning Commission without <br />being aware of the neighborhood concerns, or that there <br />were any reasons for concern regarding her personal <br />property. Ms. Sieferman expressed appreciation to the <br />Council for their consideration. <br />Councilmember Klausing spoke to his general observation <br />about variances, statutory zoning requirement, and the <br />need for Council consistency. <br />Sandy Wondra <br />Ms. Wondra reiterated her concerns regarding the Rambler <br />Beautification Program and the huge addition to the home, <br />in addition to the second story; opining that the scope of <br />the entire house was overwhelming. <br />Planning Consultant Paschke commented regarding the <br />number of variances due to the economy and interest rates, <br />allowing people to invest in their homes. Mr. Paschke <br />opined that, when Roseville was developed in the 1950's <br />and 1960's, homes were premised on the need for storm <br />water management throughout the entire city; and further <br />opined that revision of the City's code may be appropriate <br />given today's housing needs. <br />Mr. Paschke clarified that this specific request was not <br />about massing, it was about lot coverage -plain and <br />simple -how much impervious area is inclusive, is it <br />reasonable and practicable, and current. code required <br />applicants to go through a lengthy and non-refundable <br />expensive variance process to comply with property <br />improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.