Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 08/04/03 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />increase in service levels. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned why this decision <br />was being made at a department level; and that it appeared <br />we were initiating the proposed Fire Department Goal <br />Plan, still not adopted by the City Council, to bring the <br />department to a full-time EMT status. <br /> <br />Chief Gasaway defended the proposal for increasing the <br />service level for the City for moving to on-duty First <br />Responders by addressing the fixed costs (i.e., station, <br />vehicles, on-duty officers at the station) that were present, <br />and the nominal costs to allow on-duty firefighters to act <br />as First Responders, rather than sitting at the station, <br />waiting for calls, or waiting to be called in after-the-fact. <br /> <br />Councilmelnber Schroeder continued to express concern <br />regarding other significant costs for hiring; and requested <br />development of a detailed cost analysis on how three (3) <br />additional employees would be incorporated; and again <br />spoke to the Council policy issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Klausing concurred with Councilmember <br />Schroeder's comments. <br /> <br />Further discussion included the difference in design in this <br />proposal, as related to the previous request for twenty-four <br />(24) hour response, with Chief Gasaway clarifying that the <br />responses by the Department would only be to local <br />vehicle accidents when there were on-duty personnel <br />present and who held on-site authority. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder reiterated his concern that this <br />represented a substantial policy change and was an initial <br />step in the move to a full-time department, a concept not <br />fully endorsed by the Council at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn referenced an apparent internal <br />memorandum that directed implementation of a limited <br />number of medical calls effective October 1, 2003; and <br />questioned the department's authority in initiating this <br />