My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0818
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 1:58:11 PM
Creation date
4/13/2006 2:16:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/18/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed use of TIF 12 proceeds from. sale of land; futur... <br />Subject: Proposed use of TIF 12 proceeds from sale of land; future tax <br />increments <br />From: ESANDS2612@aol.com <br />Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:04:24 EDT <br />To: johnk@usfamily.net <br />CC: craig0456@attbi.com, tomkough@usfamily.net, dmaschka@gwest.net, <br />gregoryschroeder@attbi.com, neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />You stated that you would like to give the $1.2 million proceeds from the sale <br />of the land to the parks department in 1993 for park improvements and/or <br />maintenance. In my opinion, that would be treating the sale proceeds as a <br />"windfall" unrelated to TIF and contrary to the stated intent of tax increment funds <br />-- to build the tax base through commercial development and housing. Please <br />refer to my a mail of last week. This land was purchased with tax increment dollars <br />from TIF 2; I believe the proceeds should be considered a repayment of a loan <br />made to acquire this land, and left in TIF12 to be used for TIF purposes. It should <br />not be considered a "windfall". <br />Secondly, you want to borrow the necessary funds from some source in order <br />to pay for the up front costs of developing the Applewood Pointe development, <br />such as the- ponding and pathway and Terrace Drive extension, etc., estimated at <br />about $1.1 million (plus interest on the loan). This loan would then be repaid from <br />anticipated future of revenues from of 12. <br />Finally, whatever is left of the future of proceeds you would use to fund <br />appropriate HRA of projects now, again borrowing the funds in anticipation of a <br />fixed determinable amount of future tax increments. <br />It seems to me that you would be counting your chickens before they are <br />hatched. we don't really know what the future of receipts will be. Are they <br />dependent on how the value of the existing land is treated--whether or not that will <br />be included in tax increment related to this new development? I have no <br />knowledge of how this anticipated annual $200,000 of of was calculated. Also, the <br />state legislature may make changes in either the property tax, or the of laws that <br />may affect how much future of will actually be received. I view this as unnecessarily <br />risky. <br />My preference would be to play the game straight up. Use the $1.2 proceeds <br />from the sale to fund the immediate development costs, estimated at $1.1 million. <br />Then, as the future tax increments are actually realized, use them to fund future <br />TIF housing projects under the control of the HRA, as determined appropriate by <br />the Council at the time received. 1 would not object to advancing some TIF funds <br />1 of 2 8/18/2003 10:00 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.