My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:57 AM
Creation date
6/20/2006 3:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/8/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 05/08/06 <br />Minutes - Page 15 <br /> <br />Staff requested the reduction in the number of City Council <br />meeting public hearings for abatement to be reduced from two <br />to one; still providing the property owner an opportunity to speak <br />at the City Council meeting; but reducing time the neighborhood <br />must continue to tolerate a nuisance situation. <br /> <br />Staff further requested that "graffiti" and "vegetative debris" be <br />added to the list of public nuisances addressed under the <br />accelerated abatement process; and provided their rationale for <br />the request. Staff identified specific graffiti problem areas (i.e., <br />refuse dumpsters); and the numerous complaints fielded by staff <br />related to dead vegetative debris. <br /> <br />Staff suggested, after further consideration and discussion, that <br />proposed ordinance language be amended to read, "cut <br />vegetative debris." <br /> <br />Discussion included specific areas of concern and non- <br />compliance; staff's attempts to achieve resolution with and <br />compliance by property owners; City Attorney clarification of <br />written notice provided to property owner; and definition of <br />vegetative debris and graffiti. <br /> <br />Further discussion included staff discretion and consideration <br />with planned removal versus storm damage issues; naturally <br />wooded areas; stump removal; staff process for notification and <br />compliance; legitimate backyard composting and mulch <br />materials; and City Attorney Anderson's review of specific <br />sections of the ordinance defining debris to avoid conflicts and <br />confusion. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included organic gardening and lawn care <br />versus nuisance complaints; removal of tree stumps, whether <br />uprooted or cut and still in ground, and current staff practice; <br />definition of graffiti and whether authorized by the property <br />owner as decoration or for artistic purposes, and the need for <br />clarification; storage of cut wood on property; and compo sting <br />. .. <br />Issues versus nUisance Issues. <br /> <br />Staff and City Attorney Anderson discussed the three different <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.