My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:57 AM
Creation date
6/20/2006 3:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/8/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 05/08/06 <br />Minutes - Page 18 <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the proposed amendments <br />were not those previously discussed and identified by staff; and <br />further opining that the current ordinance did not need to be <br />amended, simply enforced. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson took issue with Councilmember Ihlan's <br />opinion, referencing his finn's original legal opinion dated April <br />5, 2006 addressing specific liquor code questions of <br />Councilmember Ihlan; and providing a background and analysis <br />to determine whether existing Code was consistent with Council <br />desires and expectations in processing liquor violations; in <br />addition to Roseville Code consistency with Minnesota State <br />Statute. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the designation in the proposed <br />language amendments stated recommendations of the "City <br />Manager," rather than "staff;" but the rationale was similar to the <br />process followed in land use and other recommendations to the <br />City Council and didn't create a substantive difference in his <br />opmlOn. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough concurred with Council member Ihlan; <br />opining that past events needed to be avoided in the future, with <br />the City Council maintaining authority, not the City Manager. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that, as was common with <br />ordinance adoption, amendments and fine-tuning were often <br />needed during practical use and application processes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her desire for a zero tolerance <br />level in Roseville for serving alcohol to minors; and expressed <br />her frustration and anger and the implications to community <br />values. Councilmember Ihlan cited past practice and the three <br />2005 non-compliance cases not heard by the City Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that, while people may approach the <br />issue differently, no one was disputing that individual <br />Councilmembers and the City Council as a whole, took non- <br />compliance and serving alcohol to minors as extremely serious <br />Issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.