2012_0416_Packet as amended - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Step 7 -Implement Temporary Strategy and Monitor 1 2 If a strategy is approvedit may be possible to implement first a temporary strategy.If a 3 temporary measure is used, it will be monitored fora minimum of3 months to determine its 4 effectiveness. Step 8 -Strategy Evaluation 5 6 Results from the monitoring of the temporary measure will be used to determine if the strategy 7 willbe recommended for finalapproval from the City Council. If the temporary measure is not 8 effectivethe Engineering Department will revisit the analysis and development of strategies 9 (Steps 3 and4) or choose to not continue the process. Step 9 -City Council Action 10 11 Based on thestrategyevaluation, City staff members will provide a recommendation to the City 12 Council regarding the proposed traffic management strategy. Step 10 -Design, Final Assessment Roll and Construction 13 14 If the project is approved, City staff prepares and recommends the final projectas required 15 under authority granted by Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. Step11 -Monitoring 16 17 Once a traffic management strategy has been implemented the City will continue to conduct 18 periodic monitoring of the site to collect data for future implementation of strategies and to 19 document the effectiveness of the installed strategy.This program and the associated Toolbox 20 maybe amended at any time by the City Council. 5.0 Procedure Details 21 Step 1 -Study Request (Application) 22 23 Citizensmay identify candidate streets or areas for traffic improvements. Some request maybe 24 handled by phone or verbally from citizensto City Staff, which could result in increasedpolice 25 enforcement or placement of the City's speed display equipment.Any requests for permanent 26 traffic management strategies require a written application with 51% of the project neighborhood 27 signing the application.AppendixBprovides a sample petition. 28 Application of these strategies on arterial streets is excludedfromthisprocess. Step 2 -Preliminary Review and Evaluation 29 30 The City Engineer will review requests to determine whether or not they should behandled as 31 part of the administrativetraffic engineering procedures, construction design process,or police 32 enforcement of the City.Somerequests may be able to be handled within the current Capital 33 Improvement Programsuch asplanned infrastructure improvements or reconstructions. In 34 addition, common requests forincreased traffic enforcement, andplacement of thetemporary 35 variable speed display equipmentare commonly handled by the City Traffic Safety Committee. 36 Review of requests will consist of comparing the identified street characteristics with the 37 following initial criteria: 38 The street in question must be classified as a local street in the City of Roseville(see 39 Appendix Cfor roadway jurisdiction map). 5 City Council Review Draft- 4/06/12