My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0416_Packet as amended
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0416_Packet as amended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 3:12:24 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 9:15:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />TABLE 1: <br />Traffic Management RequestRanking Criteria <br />Pathway adjacent to Benefited AreaNone +100 <br />(0 to 100 points)All of 1 side +50 <br />All of 2 sides +0 <br />Public school yard, parks, playground development None +0 <br />adjacent to benefited area (0 to 200 points)All of 1 side +100 <br />All of 2 sides +200 <br />Residential development adjacent to benefited area None +0 <br />(0 to100 points)All of 1 side +50 <br />All of 2 sides +100 <br />Number of reported correctable crashes based on 20 per crash; maximum of 200 points <br />up to 5 years of available data (0 to 200 points) <br />Average residential density adjacent to Benefited 0 dwelling units per 100 lin. ft. = 0 points <br />Area(0 to 50 points)5+ dwellings units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. = 50 <br />points <br />th <br />85Percentile speeds 5 mph over posted speed Yes -+200 <br />limit (0 to 200 points)No -+0 <br />Average Daily Traffic Volumes -ADT ADT dividedby 10; maximum 200 points <br />(0 to 200 points):For intersection, street segments or multiple <br />streets, use higher volume street <br />Percent of potential assessment properties 3 points per percent; maximum 300 points <br />supporting project by petition (180 to 300 points) <br />Step 4 -Develop/Evaluate Traffic Management Strategies <br />2 <br />3 <br />Using the data collected during the development of the traffic study and applying recognized <br />4 <br />traffic engineering standards, the City Engineering Department will recommend the use of one <br />5 <br />or more neighborhood traffic management strategies. A "toolbox" of strategies is included in <br />6 <br />Section 6.0 of this plan. While it is not inclusive of all strategies, it provides a summary of the <br />7 <br />most applied and successful strategiesas documented in the research summarized in Appendix <br />8 <br />C.The toolbox includes a brief description of the strategy, its effects on volume, speed, noise, <br />9 <br />and safety, a discussion of its advantages and disadvantages and design considerations. The <br />10 <br />following strategies are included in the toolbox: <br />11 <br />TrafficControl Devices <br />Sidewalks <br />One-Way Streets <br />Vertical Elements <br />Stop Sign Implementation <br />SpeedTables <br />All-Way Stop Sign Implementation <br />Raised Crosswalk <br />Parking Restrictions <br />Median Barrier <br />Pavement Markings/ Crosswalk Striping <br />Traffic Circle <br />Speed limits <br />Street Closure <br />Roadway Adjustments <br />Full/Diagonal Diverter <br />Narrowing Lanes <br />Partial Diverter <br />Intersection Chokers <br />Enforcement <br />Mid-Block Narrowing <br />Increased Enforcement <br />Chicane <br />Variable Speed Display Board <br />7 City Council Review Draft- 4/06/12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.