My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-04-18_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Agendas and packets
>
2012-04-18_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:58:06 AM
Creation date
4/13/2012 11:34:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Continue and build upon current � programs and diversity <br />dialogues with a focus on local and state issues. The purpose e�k� <br />�°* ^��-°^^��°N�'^*;^N� is to encourage recognitionand respectfor <br />civil and human rights, and mutual understanding and appreciation <br />among our citizens about the community's diversity. �IMPLEMEIvTE� <br />in 2011 with the P�oject 51 Sp�og�am and GROU1v�wo�LAlflfor <br />2012 with the authorization this August of an adviso�y planning <br />group, now known as the Ma��iageAmendmentAdviso�y G�oup, to <br />wo�k with the Prog�am Planning Committee. <br />E. Develop parameters and policies for future programming, <br />including the relationship between programs and positions on <br />human rights issues. �Theneedfo� such parametershas �ecently <br />been identified by the Progr�am Planning Committee and it has <br />commenced conside�ation of same. "Such pa�ameters, if adopted by <br />the Commission, may clarify and expedite the way in which dive�se <br />p�ograms a�e suppoNted, sponso�ed and promoted. "(from Program <br />PlanningCommitteeRepo�tfor Ap�il 18`h Commission meeting.) <br />F. Reassess the Student Essavproiect as to possible improvements. <br />....��ssi.��:a�e�:�..a�e+s.�E�:a+�� � K��:e•*,..ase!.! n <br />v= --- — �--- -- �_ - ;--� -__-- - - --__ - - <br />4) Development of Human Rights Policies and Strategies <br />A. Determine feasibility of Commission adopting a position <br />regarding this fall's state constitutional amendment on defining <br />marriage, as well as other constitutional amendments which have <br />direct impact on human and civil rights. �Cv�'IvTLYU1vDERwAY <br />with special HRCMeeting scheduled fo� May 10, 2012. <br />B. Considerwhether and how the Commission should take positions <br />on issues impacting human and civil rights while maintaining focus <br />and consistenc with the Commission's purpose and duties as <br />outlined in Roseville City Code, Chapter 204. <br />Attachment: Chapter 204 of the Roseville City Code <br />Adopted August 11, 2009, by Roseville Human Rights Commission. <br />Suggested Revisions & Updates January 4, 2011. <br />Adopted March 8, 2011 <br />HRC Current Status Review of 2011 Strategic Plan and 2012 Initiatives 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.