My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0204
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:38:22 AM
Creation date
6/27/2006 10:09:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/4/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />January 30, 2002 <br /> <br />To: City Council <br />City Manager _ <br /> <br />From: Council Member SChroeder~ <br />Council Member Kough v[ 14, k.~ <br /> <br />RE: Rules and Procedures clarification <br /> <br />Over the past week, Mr. Klausing has raised issues concerning the Rules and <br />Procedures that were passed by the council on January 7th, 2002. <br /> <br />Rule 10 reads as follows: "The Mayor shall review and select one or more <br />members to serve as liaisons to outside boards, associations, or joint powers <br />organizations. The Mayor shall make all appointments to Council subcommittees <br />or task forces except as specified by law or ordinance. Selections may be <br />rejected by the full Council within 30 day~ of appointment." <br /> <br />In our opinion, since the rule states that the Mayor "shall make all appointments <br />to Council subcommittees or task forces," logic dictates that the Mayor also has <br />establishment authority. The check and balance is the ability of the full Council <br />to reject appointments within 30 days. If we do not approve of the subcommittee <br />or task force, we can reject all of the appointments, rendering the subcommittee <br />or taskforce non-functioning. <br /> <br />Rule 3 reads as follows: "The Mayor, with the assistance of the City Manager, <br />shall be responsible for the selection of the items on agenda and shall <br />reasonably accommodate the members of the council and community." <br /> <br />In our opinion, we believe that logic must prevail, and the Mayor should be <br />allowed to do his job. As such, the Mayor is well within his scope of authority <br />under this rule, to establish deadlines so staff can keep the agenda process on <br />schedule. It is also reasonable that the Mayor (after possible attorney <br />consultation) would only place items on the agenda that are relevant to city <br />business and do not violate state or federal laws. The Mayor is also within his <br />scope to delay agenda requests to allow adequate time for staff research. We <br />expect that all requests be directed to the Mayor, be clearly stated, and with <br />desired outcomes identified. Finally, throughout the process, the Mayor should <br />be respectful, and keep the requesting member informed on the status of their <br />issue. <br /> <br />We believe it is time to move on, find some common ground to work from, and <br />deal with the cities business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.