res_10398 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rose vi lie, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the 24th of April, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. i The following members were present: Ihlan, Kough, Maschka, Pust, and Mayor Klausing and the following were absent: None Council Member Ihlan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: . RESOLUTION NO. 10398 A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE 60-DAY REVIEW PERIOD FOR A REZONING AND A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY CENT VENTURES, INC-LIVINGSTON-COGNOSCENTE-EXTRA LEASE, RELATED TO REDEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2700 CLEVELAND AVENUE (PF 3715) WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Cent Ventures, Inc-Livingston-Cognoscente- Extra Lease (the Developers) for a rezoning and a Planned Unit Development related to redevelopment of property located at 2700 Cleveland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the application was submitted to the Community Development Department on March 20, 2006; determined incomplete on March 30, 2006; forwarded to applicant on March 30, 2006; and has a 60 day review deadline of May 18,2006; and WHEREAS, the application was incomplete and staff communicated that to the Developers on March 30, 2006. Submission of the additional required materials will require the Developer to expend additional time and consultant services and will ultimately mean that the Developer cannot (in the staff opinion) submit the completed application in time for the May 3, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and hearings. Additional time will be needed for city staff and city consultants to review this project; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has completed a general review of the proposed site design and elevation drawings and concluded that the site plans include numerous inadequacies or discrepancies in meeting the minimum requirements of the Roseville City Code such as: 1) evaluation of the need for additional or amended EA W or AUAR work 2) conceptual review by the Rice Creek Watershed because, ultimately, the watershed regulations will change your site layout or utility layout. 3) proposed roadway alignment with Officially Mapped right of way - if not an integral part of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC Master Plan (it is unclear in your application (pg 4) line 15) if you are relying on the dimensions and master plan of the Roseville Twin Lakes LLC proposal, or creating another a new master plan and PUD as per City Code SecionI008.10.