My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0416
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2012 1:16:00 PM
Creation date
4/25/2012 1:14:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 16,2012 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Public Works Superintendent Duane Schwartz introduced the City's Assistant <br /> Finance Director in charge of loss control, Brenda Davitt. <br /> Mr. Schwartz apologized for the error in the packet materials originating from <br /> his department; and reiterated Mayor Roe's comments that the purpose of this <br /> initial discussion was to receive City Council input to staff as to whether they <br /> should continue to proceed along these lines. Mr. Schwartz noted that there <br /> were several items still pending additional staff research, including backflow <br /> devices, the permit process and code requirements for major work on sanitary <br /> sewer systems, as well as additional insurance information as previously re- <br /> quested by the City Council. <br /> Discussion included benefit of having a City contractor versus private contrac- <br /> tor in ensuring a timely clean-up to protect the health, safety, and welfare of res- <br /> idents, with the City being able to positively identify and control those costs <br /> through a contracted service, and anticipated bid process in seeking clean-up <br /> contractors serving periodically on an on-call basis and providing competitive <br /> pricing at the lowest possible cost for all parties. It was noted that this process <br /> would be similar to that used by other communities with such programs in <br /> place; and staff estimating that the annual cost of such a contract would be <br /> $3,000 - $8,000, and hopefully offset some of the time currently spent by staff <br /> on damage claims. <br /> Further discussion included what would be involved in such a clean-up from a <br /> mediation standpoint to ensure the health, safety and welfare of residents versus <br /> cost of materials involved in finished lower levels; and how to identify what <br /> was and what was not covered. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Ms. Davitt estimated that the typi- <br /> cal cost, based on staff's experience to-date, would be $5,000 to $10,000 de- <br /> pending on how much of the lower level of a home was finished. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested further discussion consider whether a limit <br /> of$5,000 per incident or per resident should be applied; ensuring that compe- <br /> tent and timely removal and disinfection was provided, but not remodeling are- <br /> as. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Schwartz estimated that most <br /> episodes rarely saw more than 1-2 inches of back-up, and mostly affected car- <br /> pets and floor coverings, not sheetrock and insulation materials. <br /> Councilmember Johnson noted that basically there were two (2) types of con- <br /> tractors: that of clean-up remediation services, and those services provided by a <br /> construction service, with the City clearly needing to define their involvement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.