My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0416
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2012 1:16:00 PM
Creation date
4/25/2012 1:14:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 16,2012 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Mr. Carlson advised that preliminary recommendations for potential corridor <br /> implementation in the near future included whether those corridors were about <br /> to be studied for other transit modes, at which time an advanced study toward <br /> implementation would be considered. Those two (2) corridors ready to imple- <br /> ment in the near future included the Snelling Avenue corridor and the West <br /> Seventh Street Corridor. Mr. Carlson noted that the Snelling Avenue corridor <br /> was 9.7 miles, with twenty-one (21) stations, with an estimated $26.8 million <br /> capital costs based on 2011 dollars. <br /> During the final phase of the transit study, Mr. Carlson reviewed the efforts to- <br /> date in seeming input from over thirty (30) communities and/or organizations; <br /> and public meetings held earlier this year. Next steps toward project implemen- <br /> tation would include securing funding and local support; and then the design <br /> and engineering phases specific to the corridor and its design; with each of those <br /> phases including increased community and stakeholder engagement. Mr. Carl- <br /> son advised that they had received great support and interest from Roseville to- <br /> date; and anticipated that to continue as the project moved forward. <br /> Discussion included whether the Rosedale Transit Hub would continue or if <br /> other alternate locations would be provided if the Rosedale site did not contin- <br /> ue; differentiating between the hub and park and ride elements; strategic loca- <br /> tion of the Rosedale Mall for local buses as well as transport to and from the <br /> mall; and rationale in not including the Rice Street corridor in studies, with the <br /> original study implemented in 2008 and Rice Street not identified at that time <br /> with sentiments received by the Metropolitan Council to do so from municipali- <br /> ties as well as Ramsey County. <br /> Further discussion included how routes and their connections were prioritized <br /> based on demand and available routing options; competitive nature in providing <br /> transit options and timing for those options for customers; and inclusion of <br /> transit-oriented development along corridors (e.g. NE Diagonal) in place in lo- <br /> cal cities that could facilitate development of the Transitway as well, with plan- <br /> ning efforts by the Metropolitan Council including local comprehensive plans <br /> for intensification and transit development and contributing to baseline growth <br /> in ridership in modeling efforts. <br /> Additional discussion included recognizing that all transit riders begin as pedes- <br /> trians and the need to provide safe connections and traffic flow, with pedestrian <br /> features updated in overall packages as improvements are made and older traffic <br /> control systems replaced. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Mr. Carlson for his presentation. <br /> 11. Public Hearings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.