My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-03-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-03-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 12:07:54 PM
Creation date
4/26/2012 12:07:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/27/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feeder lines. Chair DeBenedet provided his rationale in this request to consider <br /> safety concerns in getting first responders activated and able to access the <br /> community on those collector and sub-collector streets in case of a significant <br /> emergency situation. Chair DeBenedet suggested that this safety aspect for <br /> Roseville citizens and the ability of first responders to access residents be <br /> considered when the Commission reviewed prioritizing streets for <br /> undergrounding. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that staff would request that information from Xcel Energy <br /> and gauge their cooperation accordingly. <br /> Chair DeBenedet opined that, with equipment undergrounded, it seemed that there <br /> would be less maintenance of those facilities. <br /> Discussion included major feeder lines underground and above-ground on County <br /> Road C. <br /> Member Felice suggested this may be an additional criterion; with Chair <br /> DeBenedet opining that it was already included in the 5th criteria, and just needed <br /> the detailed refined. <br /> Further discussion included co-location of fiber in undergrounding and its <br /> compatibility; difficulties and considerations of each utility and their specific <br /> trench needs and challenges; differences for communities with significant new <br /> development opportunities versus a fully-developed and aging community such as <br /> Roseville; and existing underground utilities that may already be in place and <br /> unavailable for additional utilities. <br /> Member Vanderwall noted the cooperative ventures of the school district and city <br /> on shared fiber network opportunities. <br /> Member Gjerdingen opined that he could see the advantages of undergrounding <br /> corridors with over 5000 ADT traffic volumes after tonight's discussion when <br /> safety and aesthetics for arterials were taken into consideration, as he had <br /> originally only been considering aesthetic issues for gateway streets. <br /> Chair DeBenedet asked that staff provide further discussion and revisions, based <br /> on tonight's discussion, at the April meeting. <br /> Eureka Recycling Report <br /> Mr. Schwartz referenced the most recent report, provided for informational <br /> purposes, seeking any input or significant questions of the PWET Commission for <br /> Eureka. <br /> For the benefit of the listening audience, Chair DeBenedet noted the low residual <br /> rate (items put into recycling that should not be) in Roseville as a positive; <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.