Laserfiche WebLink
Richfield doesn't assess at all, but levied the funds, similar to the City of <br /> Roseville's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and current Assessment Policy. <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that the City of St. Louis Park had switched almost entirely to <br /> basing their assessments on appraisals and expected benefit of a project and <br /> assessing accordingly, similar to the Cities of Maplewood and Inver Grove <br /> Heights. Ms. Bloom advised that staff had held good discussions with those <br /> communities on their rationale in making those transitions and subsequent results <br /> of those methods. Depending on the properties identified that will benefit from a <br /> project—with a commercial or residential appraisal completed—to determine the <br /> maximum benefit, with a base assessment rate of less than that, and consistent <br /> with State Statutes. <br /> Regarding Zoning Districts, Ms. Bloom identified several examples of businesses <br /> in commercial and mixed-use districts. <br /> At the request of Member Felice, Ms. Bloom noted that assessments were based <br /> on Chapter 429 of Minnesota State Statutes, allowing cities to assess for projects <br /> based on adding more value to a home or business, rather than a city arbitrarily <br /> deciding on assessments, allowing property owners protection, applicable to all <br /> zoning districts and a consistent policy. <br /> Discussion included types of benefits (e.g. mill and overlay, total reconstruction); <br /> property owner rights of appeal and potential renegotiation of assessments; lead <br /> time for assessable projects, estimated to be one (1) year in accordance with <br /> Chapter 429 scheduling. <br /> Over the last six (6) years, Ms. Bloom advised that the City of Roseville process <br /> usually included four (4)informational meetings with affected property owners, <br /> in addition to the formal Public Hearing process. Since the City of Roseville did <br /> not currently assess property owners for mill and overlay projects, Ms. Bloom <br /> advised that projects were much better received by its constituents. Ms. Bloom <br /> reviewed current project funding for those mill and overlay through interest <br /> earnings from the PMP; however, she noted the challenges with current interest <br /> rates and keeping the PMP sustainable. Ms. Bloom noted that other communities <br /> didn't necessarily have such program as the City of Roseville's PMP, and <br /> therefore were forced to consider other options, such as assessments, as a funding <br /> source. <br /> Discussion included the appraisal process done by communities, such as the City <br /> of Maplewood, to determine the percentage of increased benefit for properties <br /> averaging between 25-30%, comparable to the City of Roseville's total project <br /> cost breakdown per linear foot. Ms. Bloom noted that the City of Maplewood's <br /> before and after appraisal property values averaged an increase of 30%; with the <br /> City of Roseville's current reconstruction projects averaging an assessment value <br /> of 25% in accordance with its existing Assessment Policy. <br /> Page 6 of 15 <br />