Laserfiche WebLink
Sign Plan hearing. The City Planner Community Development Department may <br />notify additional property owners if a determination is made that such additional <br />notification is merited. <br />c. The MSPC shall hold the administrative hearing as scheduled by the City <br />Planner. <br />4.d.Hearing and Approval:The MSPC shall hold an administrative hearing for <br />each Master Sign Plan proposal, take public comment, and render and provide a <br />recommendation forward a recommendation to the Community Development <br />Director or Designee for approval. and t The Community Development Director <br />or Designee shall make the final decision and provide written approval of a <br />Master Sign Plan to the applicant. <br />5.e.Appeal:Should the applicant or a contiguous property owner object to the <br />Community Development Director or Designee decision on the Master Sign Plan, <br />an appeal may be filed within 10 days following the administrative decision by <br />the Community Development Director or Designee. The appeal shallfollow the <br />requirements listed in Section 1009.08 of this Code. be made in writing and shall <br />be addressed to the City Manager. The City Council shall take up the appeal at a <br />regular board meeting within 45 days on the appeal. The Master Sign Plan appeal <br />shall follow notice requirements and other procedures contained in Chapter 108 <br />of the Title. (Ord. 1359, 1-28-2008) (Ord. 1371, 7-28-2008) <br />5.0PCC <br />LANNINGOMMISSIONONSIDERATION <br />5.1On April 4, 2012, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public <br />hearing regarding the proposed sign regulation modifications, at which hearing no <br />citizens were present to address the Commission. <br />5.2Commissioners did have questions of the City Planner from which a few minor <br />corrections were made to the proposal (menu board removed form definitions; other <br />temporary signs heading changed to other signs; clarification of exterior illumination in <br />residential districts; and typographical corrections). <br />5.3The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the proposed <br />amendments to chapter 1010, Sign Regulations of the Roseville City Code as modified <br />by the Commission. <br />6.0SA <br />UGGESTEDCTION <br />Provide the City Planner feedback on the proposed amendment to Chapter 1010, Sign <br />Regulations. However, if the City Council is inclined, a draft clean ordinance has been <br />attached for approval. <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke; 651-792-7074 <br />Attachments: A. PC Minutes <br /> B. Draft Resolution <br />PROJ0013_SignRegulations_RPCA_040412 <br /> <br />