Laserfiche WebLink
The quicic ratio — the dii�ierence bet�,�-een stron� siipport and total oppositio�t -���as �8°�0. <br />indicating an excellent chance of success at the polls. In the 1990 study, the quick ratio ���as --1°%. <br />a shakier result. <br />Bond Referendum Support <br />Residents were next asked to consic�er the consequences af a bond referendum f'or the <br />eonstruction and partial operation of a new Community Center: <br />A bonc� referendum woa�ld be required to pay for its <br />construction and pat-tial operating costs, User fees <br />would also underwrite the operation of the community <br />center to some extent. <br />How much would you be willing to pay in additional <br />p�o�erty taxes to support the constrzection and partial <br />operation of a new Ro.reville Communi _ry Center? <br />Let's say, would ynu be willing tc� pay S per yeirr? <br />Ho►v about .� per year? <br />The typical Roseville resideni would support a pro�crty tax increase af $27.20 per ycar for this <br />purpose: <br />NOTHING . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2�% <br />$20.00 . ......................................... 18% <br />$40.�0 ........................................... 16°�0 <br />$60.00 ....................... .................... 9% <br />$80.00 ............................................ 4°./0 <br />$1Q0.00 ............................................ 6% <br />�i2o.ao ............................................ Z�ro <br />DON'T KNOW .......... .......................... 19% <br />RE�USED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2°/a <br />However, twenty-f�ve percent indicated they would be unwilling to support any property t� <br />increase for the construction of a new community center. <br />"Nothing" was posted by city residents for over twenty years. "$2_0.04" was reported by <br />hauseho�ds containing children. "$60.00" was offered by over $50,000.00 annual income <br />households and Precincts Eight, Nine and Ten residents. "$80.00" was selec#ed by city residents <br />for five years or less, while "$100.00" was cited by owners of homes valued at over $150,000.�0 <br />and over $50,000.00 annual income households. <br />One consequence of this result was that a bond referendum would have a much better chance of <br />passage if it were held in a Presidential Election year. <br />84 <br />