Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville resideilts were asked a short series of questions abaut public safety and crime issues. <br />Neighborhood problems were discussed, as well as general fears about safety witl�in the <br />cammunity. Perceptions of change during the past few years �vere ascertained. And, finaIly, <br />steps talcen to assure safer residents were ex,plored. <br />Emergency Medical <br />Service <br />Respondents were initially asked: <br />Have you or any member njyour household needed <br />ambulance or emergency medical servrce -- LMS -- <br />during the past year? <br />Eight perce�t reported they or household rnembers had needed ambulance or emergcncy mcdical <br />service during the past year: <br />YES......... ......................... ....... 8% <br />NO................... ............_.......... 92% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br />"Yes" was indicated most aften by households containing seniors and over sixty-five ye.ar olds. <br />s`No" was posted most frequently by over $50,000.00 annual income hauseholds. <br />Next, those who had required these services were asked a pair of queries. First, prompEncss was <br />considered: <br />Did the umbulance or EMS personnel arrive prornPtly, <br />or not? <br />Eighty-eight percent rated ±heir arrival as "prompt:" <br />YF,S ................................... ........ 7% <br />NO............................................ Q% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFiJS�D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% <br />There were no statistically significant subgroup differences noted. <br />Then, personnel professi�nalism was discussed: <br />Were the ambulance or EMS personnei pr�fessional, <br />or not? <br />89 <br />