My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOT TOO SERIOiJS . . <br />NOT AT ALL SERIOUS <br />DON'"I' KNOW/REFUSED <br />J�% <br />. -��% <br />... 2% <br />"Serious" was mentioned most frequently by cighteen to forty�-#our year olds, «°hile "not serious" <br />was posted most often 6y residents who feel the quality of lifc is excellent. <br />Auto theft <br />Thirteen percer_t rated neighborhood auto theft as "vcry serious" or "somewhat scrious:" <br />VERY SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 % <br />SOMEWHA"1' SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% <br />NOT TOO SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . 4 �%� <br />NOT AT ALL SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40% <br />DON'T KNOW/REPUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �% <br />This pro�lem was seen as "serious" by city residents for six to twenty years, owners of homes <br />valued at under $100,000.00 aad residents who fee� the quality of life is good or only fafr. It was <br />not serious in the eyes of inen and residents who feel thc quality of life is excellent. <br />Bike theft <br />Neighborhood bike theft was seen as eilher a"very serious" or "somewhat serious" problem by <br />thirieen percent: <br />VERY SERIOLJS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3% <br />SOIb7EWHAT SERIOLJS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13% <br />NOT TOQ SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41% <br />NOT A'T ALL SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33°/a <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% <br />"Serious" was mentioned most otten by Precincts One, "rwo and Three residents and residents <br />who feei the quality of life is good or only fair. "Not serious" was most apt to be stated by <br />residents who feel the quality of life is excelient. <br />General theft? <br />Fifteen percent considered general theft in their neighborhood as either "very serious" or <br />"somewhat serious:" <br />VERY SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% <br />SOMEWHAT SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14°�0 <br />NOT TOO SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47% <br />NOT AT ALL SERIOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 5% <br />91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.