1998 Residential Survey - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Those receiving the city netivsletter ��as also asked: Ho�� effective is the c•ih:° rzetiti•slelter• in keeping y�oir in- formed about activities rn the cir1� -- i�erv �f�ectire, somewhat efjective, rrot too effectii�e, or not at all effective? Eighty-two percent regarded the city newslctter as either "very effectivc'' or'`some��,hat e(fective:" VERY EFFECTIVE , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33% SOMEWHAT EFFECTIVF . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . �9°'0 NOT `TOO EFFECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 5% Only four percent were more critical in their judgrxzents. It was regarded as more effective among residents who feel the quality of liie is excetlent. �vhile it was thought to be less effective arfiong eighteen to forty-four year olds. The reach of the city newsletter has inereased somewhat since the I990 study; and, in addition, its �ffectiveness as an information source was among the highest in the Metropolitan Area. Cable Tele�ision Residents were initially queried: Does your household currently receive cable televis�on? l�ifty-iive percent reported currently subscribing to cable television: YES........................................... 55% NO..................... ..............,.... 45% DON'T KN�W/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% Subscribers were rnore likel_y to be non-college graduates and less likely to he college graduatcs. Cable subscribers were asked a trio of questions about their viewerst�ip habits and prcferenccs. First, the size of the Channel 16 audience ��vas established: During the past six months, have yna� watched tele- casts of the Roseville City Cnuncil Meetings on Channel 16? Channcl 16 w�as viewed by twenty-four percent of all the households in the community; its reach among cable subscribing hausehoids was foriy-four percent: 102