Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Chagter Onc: Residential Demographics . . . . . . . . <br />Resiciential Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . <br />Residential Longevity . . . . <br />Household Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Age of Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Formal Education of Respondent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Home 4wnership . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Household Uccupation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Gender............................................ <br />Region of City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Summary and Conclusion.s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />.......6 <br />..7 <br />. . ..7 <br />.... . . ..7 <br />... ..9 <br />.. ... ..9 <br />. ia <br />........10 <br />. 11 <br />...... .. .I2 <br />.............12 <br />Chaptcr Two: Perceptions of the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 <br />Perceptions of the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 <br />Quality of Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 � <br />Quality Aspects of the City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 <br />Most Serious Issue facing the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 <br />Reason for Staying in Roseville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 <br />Satisfaction with Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 <br />Qualiry of their Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 <br />Neighborhood Roots ............... .......................... 2I <br />Neighbors........................................ ..............21 <br />Desirability of Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 <br />Neighborhood Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 <br />GeneralDirectionoftheCity . ..... .........••••••••....••.•.-.•••.31 <br />Recommend to Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 <br />Empowerment........... ........................ ..............32 <br />Summary and Conciusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 <br />Chapter Three: City Services and Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 <br />City Services and Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 <br />City Service Evaluations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 <br />City Tax Burden ........... ......................................42 <br />Tax Increase to Maintain Services . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 <br />Comparative Perspective on City T�xes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 <br />Value of City Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 <br />Augmenting and C�ntracting City Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 <br />Trade-Off between Quality and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 <br />City Tax Polici�s .................................................47 <br />City Services and Partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 <br />General Fund Subsidies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 <br />Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 <br />Chapter Four: Development and Redevelopment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 55 <br />Development and Redevelopment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 <br />3 <br />