My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and Ten residents and residents w-ho feel the qualit}• of life is �ood ar onl�• fair. <br />Available healih care facilities <br />Sixty-four percent rated available health care tacilities as eithcr '`excellent" or "good:" <br />CXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . <br />GOC?D ........................ <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . <br />POOR ............. ..... <br />D�N'T KNOW/REFUSED <br />Twenty-five percent saw it as "only fair" or "poor." <br />.. 13% <br />..... ... Si°/a <br />........... 22% <br />..... ....... 3% <br />. lU% <br />Ratings were higher among over $50,000.00 annual income households and residcnts who feel <br />the quality of life is excellent. They were lower among ciry residents for five years or Icss, <br />eighteen to forty-four year olds, renters, under $50,000.(}0 annual income households, I'recincts <br />Fight, Nine and Ten residents and residents who feel the quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Avaalable full-time jobs <br />Forty-�ight percent rated their neighborhood as "excellenE" or "good" in available full-timc jobs: <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% <br />GOOD...................._. ............ . 38% <br />ONLY FAIR........ . ............... ..... .... 18% <br />POOR ° <br />......................... . .. ..... ..... o <br />DON'T K1VOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31% <br />Twenry-iwo pezcent saw it as "only fair" or "poor." <br />M.ore iavorable ratings were encountered a�nong eightcen to forty-four year olds and residents <br />who feel the quality of life is excellent. Unfavorable ratings were given more frequently by ciEy <br />residents for ftve years or less, non-college graduates, renters, under $50,000.00 annual income <br />households and residents who feel the quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Several aspects of the respondents' neighborhoods posted an unsatisfactory level of "only fair" <br />and "poor" ratings: "a place to purchase luxury housing," "bus service," "freedoln from excessive <br />noise," "a place to purchase a starter home," "available health care facilities," and "availablc fi�ll- <br />timc jobs." <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.