My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED <br />I Iowever, thirty-nine percent saw it as -'oniy fair�� or "poor. <br />V�D <br />Ratings were higher among households containing seniors, empty nesters, aver sirty-t�ve year <br />olds, college graduates, owners of homes valued at $100,000.00 to $150,000.00 and residents <br />who feel the quality of life is excellent. They wcre Iower among househole�s containing children, <br />eighteen to forty-four year olds, non-college graduatcs and residents who feel the quality of life is <br />gooc� or only fair. <br />Problems with businesses in 1he neighborhoo�t <br />Businesses in their neighbarhood were rated as "excellent" or "good" by fifty-four percent: <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13% <br />(i00D ............. . ... .......,,.... .. 41% <br />ONL� FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% <br />POOR............... ,,...... . ...... 3% <br />DON`T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . , . . . . �4% <br />"Chirteen percent rated them lower, while thirty-four percent wer� uncertain. <br />Favarable ratings were posted by under $50,000.00 annual income households an� residents �vho <br />feel the quality of life is excellent. Unfavorable ratings were mentioned by forty-five to sixty- <br />four year olds, non-college graduates, men and residents who feel the quality of life is good or <br />only fair. <br />Vandalism <br />Sixty-four percent rated the lack of vandalism in their neighborhood as "excellent" or "good:" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13% <br />GOOD........................................... 51% <br />ONLY FAIR ............. ......................... I6% <br />POOR................. .......................... 1% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20% <br />Seventeen percent, though, considered the lack of vandalism as"only fair" or "poor" in their <br />immediatc area. Twenty percent were unable to provide an evaluation. <br />Ratings were higher among residents who feel the quality of life is excellent, and lower among <br />non-coll�ge graduates. <br />Park maintenance <br />Eighty-three percent rated park maintenance as "excellent" or "good:" <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.