My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thirty-six percent sav�� thcm as "high" in comparison ti�ith other nearb�� areas. «l�ile onl� t«o <br />percent felt they were comparatively "low:" <br />VERY IiIGH . . . . . . . . . . >% <br />SOMEWHATHIUII .... .. .... ... �1% <br />ABOUT AVER�IGE . . . . . . . . 47% <br />SOMEWHA'I' LOW . . 2% <br />VERY LOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED l6% <br />A large forty-seven percent felt thcir taxes were comparatively '`about average." <br />"High" �vas suggested by owners of homes valucd at $ i 00,000.00 to $150,000.00 and Precincts <br />Qne, "1`wo and Three residents. <br />Value of Gi Services <br />Roseville residents were queried: <br />When you considet the city property taxes you pay <br />und the quality of the city services you receive, would <br />you rale the general value of city .services as excell- <br />ent, good, only fair, or poor? <br />A very high cighty-seven percent rated the value of city services as "exce�lent" or "good:" <br />EXCELLENI' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19% <br />GOUD............. ......,........,...... 68% <br />ONLY FA1R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . 6% <br />POOR ......... ......... .............. 1% <br />D�N'T KNOW/A�:FUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6% <br />Six percent were more critical in their judgments. <br />Positive ratings were given hy Precincts Four, Five, Six and Seven residents and residents who <br />feel the quality of life is exceilent. Negative ratings were posted by owners of homes valued at <br />under $100,QOQ.QQ, men, Precincts 4ne, Two and "I�ree residents and residents who feel the <br />quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Critics were asked a follow-up question: <br />Why d� you feel that way? <br />Perceptions of "high taaces" motivated two-thirds of the dissidents: <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br />HIGH TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4% <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.