My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville citizens were asked a number of questions about development policics. Neighborhood <br />rehabilitation was thc initial focus, followed by general economic devclopment priorities. <br />Housing inspection policies were cxplored, and support for the placement of utility lines <br />undcrground was ascertained. Finally, the potcntiai market for senior housing was �stimated for <br />the future. <br />Blighted Housing and <br />Deteriorating <br />Neighborhoods <br />Roseville respondents were asked a short series of questions abaut the City's approach to <br />housing and neighborhood rehabilitation. ��irs±, the offering of funding and expertise vvas <br />discussed: <br />Would you favor or oppose the city offerisag funding <br />and expertise to residential property owners and neigh- <br />borhoods in deteriorating areas_for both housing and <br />neighborhood rehabilitation? <br />Seventy-three percent "favored" ti�e city offering funding and expertise to resid.ential property <br />owners and neighborhoods in deteriorating areas: <br />STRONGI�Y FAVOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25% <br />FAVOR.................................,...,.... 48% <br />OPPOSE .......................................... 14% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11% <br />Sixteen percent were "opposed" to this approach, �vhile eleven percent were uncertain about it. <br />Support was higher among forty-five to sixty-four year olds and lower among Precincts One, <br />Two and Three residents. <br />Next, the aggressive aiding in the purchase and redevelopment of deteriorating and blighted <br />neighborhoods was examined: <br />Would you favor• or oppose the city aggressively ai�l <br />ing in the purchase and redevelopment of deteriorat- <br />ing and blighted neighbnrhoods as multi family hous- <br />ing oFporturities, retail shopping, and/or commercial <br />office buildings? <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.