My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thinking uhout that Icrst cont�rc't. �or c�crclz r�J�the folloi+•- <br />rng characteristics, ple�rse ratc� 1he Roserille City stcrff <br />as excellent, good, onit�,furr, or panj'.... <br />A list of five quality dimensions was thcn read: <br />Courtesy of the Information Desk receptionist? <br />Ninety percent rated the courtesy of the Information Desk receptionist as "excellent" or "good:�" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17% <br />CirOOD........................................... 23% <br />ONLY FAIR....... ................ ........... . 1% <br />PO�R ..... ............................ ...... 1% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% <br />Only fotu' percent were more critical. There were no statisticaIly significant subgroup dif�ferences <br />noted. <br />Waiting tirrae_ for service? <br />Eighty-four percent rated ihe waiting time for service highl�: <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14% <br />GOOD.......................................... 23% <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4�/0 <br />POOR......... ................................. i% <br />D4N'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2°/a <br />Eleven percent were more critical of the performance on this dimension. Favorable ratings were <br />posted by empty nesters and Precincts Four, Five, Six and Seven resic�enis. <br />Ease of reaching a department staff inember who could help you? <br />Eighty-eight percent rated the ease of reaching a department staff member who could help them <br />as "excellent" or "good:" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ° <br />................. 15 0 <br />GOOD.......................................... 23% <br />ONLYFAIR ........................................ 4% <br />POOR........... .... ......... ................. 1% <br />DON'T KNOW/R�FUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br />Twelve percent were more negative in iheir judgments. Unfavorable ratings were given most <br />often by households containing children. <br />70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.