Laserfiche WebLink
An crdditional indoor ice sheet? <br />By a sixty-eight percent to eighteen perccnt mar�in. residents apposed an additional indoor ice <br />sheet: <br />�TRONGLY FAVOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4% <br />FAVOR............ .......................... l�% <br />OPPOSE ........... .............................. 30% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30% <br />DON'T KNOW/RI:FUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l�% <br />Support was higher among city residents for five years or Iess and eighteen to forty-four year <br />olds. It was lower among city residents for over tw°enty years and owners of homes valued at <br />$100,000.00 to $150,00�.00. <br />A banquet room_for community meeting and rental purposes? <br />By a sixty-eight percent to tv��enty-ane percent verdict, residents supported the inc�usion of a <br />banauet room for community meeting and renial purpases: <br />STRONGI,Y F%1VOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 % <br />FAVOR ....................... ............. 47% <br />OPPOaE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11°10 <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% <br />DON'T ICNOW/KEFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L 1% <br />Favorable judgments were posfed by residents who feel the quality af life is excellent, while <br />unfavorable evaluations were encountered among residcnts wha feel the :�uality of life is good or <br />only fair. <br />An indoor running-walking track? <br />By a seventy-two per�ent to twenty-t�vo percent margin, residents sup�orted the inclusion oi an <br />indoor running-walking track: <br />STRONGLY FAVOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34% <br />FAVOR .......................................... 38°/a <br />OPPOSE ........... .............................. 13% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% <br />DON'T KNOWfREFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7°/a <br />Support was higher among households containing children, eighteen to f'orty-four year olds and <br />over $50,000.00 annual income households. It was l�wer among owners of homes valued at <br />under $ l 00,OQ0.00. <br />so <br />