My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_report_exec_summ
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
2002_report_exec_summ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:14:22 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:29:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meanwhile Roseville is not meeting goals set <br />by the City Council to reduce waste and in- <br />crease recycling. Each Minnesotan produces <br />more than a ton of trash a year up 23% since <br />1993. And recycling participation rates and the <br />amount collected have shown no pattern of <br />consistent growth since 1992 (see graphs at <br />right). <br />Using the knowledge gained from our activi- <br />ties, Committee members determined what we <br />saw as the elements of an effective solid waste <br />and recycling system and then ranlced them in <br />order of importance (see detailed list in Appen- <br />dix A). <br />What are the elements of an effective solid <br />waste and recycling system? <br />Rank Element <br />1 Environmentally preferred <br />management of waste. <br />2 Reasonable cost <br />2 (tie) Good Customer Service <br />4 Education <br />5 Simple and Convenient <br />5 (tie) Access to Service <br />7 Customer Choice <br />8 Expanded Opportunities for <br />Disposal of Difficult Items <br />9 Reduce Traffic <br />Committee members used the City Council's <br />environmental goals as well as their list of <br />elements of an effective solid waste and recy- <br />cling system and their knowledge of solid <br />waste and recycling policies and programs as <br />they deliberated various options that could be <br />incorporated into Roseville's recycling and <br />garbage systems. <br />Clean Up Day <br />Cities that run Clean up days organize them as <br />an annual event residents can plan on to dis- <br />pose of items that typically cannot be put in <br />with their regular trash such as appliances, <br />0 <br />Roseville Recycling <br />3500 <br />s000 <br />2500 <br />z000 <br />�soo <br />�000 <br />soo <br />0 <br />1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 <br />❑ Tonnage <br />� so,000 <br />160,000 <br />�ao,000 <br />� 20,000 <br />� oo,000 <br />ao,000 <br />60,000 <br />ao,000 <br />Zo,000 <br />0 <br />1987 1989 1991 1993 1895 1997 1999 2001 <br />■ Pickups� <br />ITe curbside rrcydinR progam was oncr � mon1A p�ckup (rom �uly 1987 <br />throu� Jnlp 19Mtf. from AuRuR 1988 throuRh I)er�mbrr 19% il wa• tvro <br />p�ckups prr mon11�. <br />furniture and brush. <br />According to the Committee's 2002 Roseville <br />resident survey there appears to be significant <br />interest in holding a clean up day in Roseville. <br />Seventy-eight percent of homeowners and 70% <br />of multi-unit complex residents said they <br />would be very likely or somewhat lilcely to take <br />items to a clean up day. <br />Recommendations: <br />The committee recommends Roseville <br />re-institute an annual clean up day run by a <br />private coinpany in which the City pays one- <br />third of the disposal cost (approxiinately <br />$12,000 ayear). The committee also recom- <br />mends the clean up day have a reuse area <br />where residents can swap reusable items, and <br />have electronics collection where the company <br />guarantees the products will be dismantled and <br />recycled in the United States. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.