My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Solid Waste 2002 report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Solid Waste 2002 report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
When asked to rank elements of a garbage collection system, residents again indicated that <br />ensuring the lowest cost was the most important thing to them. Guaranteeing a high level of <br />customer service was also a priority. Many residents ranked ability to choose a hauler as their top <br />priority or as the item that was least important to them. <br />Forty-six percent ranked lower cost as what <br />was most important. Twenty-five percent said <br />ability to choose their hauler and 16% said <br />guarantee garbage is taken to a recovery <br />facility. While customer service was a bit <br />lower as a first choice (15%), it moved up as a <br />priority when we compare the top three <br />choices. Eighty-nine percent ranked lower cost <br />as one of their top three choices, 80% listed <br />customer service and then it fell down to 58% <br />listing ability to choose and 55% listing take <br />garbage to a recovery facility. <br />What's Important in a Garbage System <br />(ranked in the top three choices) <br />Lower Cost <br />High Level of Service <br />Ability to choose a hauler <br />Guarantee Garbage Goes to a RRF <br />Reduce Truck Traffic <br />89% <br />80% <br />58% <br />54% <br />24% <br />Reducing truck traffic ranked way down by <br />survey respondents. Fifty-four percent listed it as the item that was least important to them. That <br />was followed by 25% listing ability to choose and 13% saying take garbage to a recovery facility <br />was least important to them. <br />Organized collection of garbage can reduce rates (because of economies of scale) and truck traffic <br />while limiting residents' ability to choose a hauler. When asked if they would want the City to <br />limit the number of haulers in order to achieve the benefits of organized collection, only cost <br />seem to appeal to Roseville homeowners. Fifty-three percent said they would want Roseville to <br />limit the number of haulers in order to negotiate lower rates. Forty percent said they would not <br />want Roseville to limit the number of haulers. Far fewer resident said they would want to limit <br />trucks in order to have one of the other benefits. <br />Where Garbage Goes <br />Once garbage in Roseville is picked up it can be taken to various disposal sites including land- <br />fills, resource recovery facilities and/or transfer stations (see appendix H). Construction and <br />demolition waste from work done on your house must go to special C&D landfills and is not <br />included in state totals used to track household waste. <br />Other options not used by companies that serve Roseville residents include incineration and <br />composting. The City of Minneapolis operates a garbage incinerator where there is no processing <br />of the waste; all garbage brought there is burned to produce electricity. <br />The Prairieland Composting Facility in Truman, Minnesota is designed to compost garbage. <br />Garbage is brought to the facility and processed so that noncompostable material such as plastics <br />and household batteries are removed. The material is then put in a covered storage facility to <br />decompose. The fmished compost can be sold but it is not in much demand. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.