Laserfiche WebLink
Pros Cons <br />Option 1 —Residents are familiar with it —Participation rates and tonnages <br />Current are stagnant <br />System —Less residua] and out throw <br />—Higher collection cost <br />—Lower processing cost <br />—Difficulty of getting bins to the <br />—Bins can be modified to add curb <br />lids and wheels <br />—Storage concerns inhibiting full <br />—Lowest cost ($2.05 per participation <br />household, per month) <br />Option 2 —Abates storage concerns because —DifFiculty getting bins to curb <br />Weekly of less build up <br />Collection —Higher collection cost <br />—Less residual and out throws <br />—Less convenient <br />—Lower processing cost <br />—Increased truck traffic <br />—Bins can be modified to add lids <br />and wheels —88% of residents surveyed said <br />every other weelc collection is often <br />enough <br />—Higher Cost ($2.10-2.25 per house- <br />hold, per month) <br />Option 3 —Convenient (no sorting) —Higher cost of processing <br />Single —�eeled and covered containers —Higher residual and out throw rates <br />Stream <br />—Lower cost of collection —Only one vendor <br />—Provides additional storage space —If City doesn't own bins, would <br />have to buy a new set if new vendor <br />—Less truck traffic because trucks <br />don't fill as quicicly since they can —Waste Management has less incen- <br />compact material tive to recover glass and sell it to a <br />manufacturer for recycling <br />—Higher participation/ More ton- <br />nage collected —Residents surveyed split 50/50 on <br />whether they want it <br />—Highest cost ($2.25 per household <br />per month) <br />63 <br />