My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Solid Waste 2002 report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Solid Waste 2002 report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
charged $3.50 a month for their program. <br />Ramsey County cities with organized collection such as Little Canada and North St. Paul require <br />haulers offer yard waste collection. Residents can choose a yearly rate or a charge per bag similar <br />to what is done in Roseville. <br />B1'ush: Roseville used to accept brush during City spon- <br />sored Clean Sweep days. Residents brought brush to the <br />Ramsey County site on Larpenteur east of Dale. There was a <br />nominal charge for dropping off brush. Roseville discontin- <br />ued its Clean Sweep days in the early 1990's because the <br />City could not find a contractor to run the white and bulky <br />goods portion. <br />There does not appear to be strong interest among Roseville <br />residents in offering a brush drop off service again. In the <br />2002 resident survey 55 percent of homeowners said that if <br />Roseville operated a brush drop off site they were not likely to use it. <br />However there was high usage of curbside collection of brush following the windstorm in 2000. <br />City crews targeted the northeast quadrant of Roseville that was the area with the most damage. <br />Residents could also use a drop offsite at the Arboretum. It cost the City $116,496 to run that <br />special brush collection. Much of that was offset by reimbursement from FEMA. (Some resi- <br />dents were disappointed Roseville did not offer curbside collection of brush throughout the City <br />as was done in Shoreview). The brush was chipped and made available for residents to take with <br />them or pick up from bins at the leaf compost site. Residents used many of the chips and the rest <br />were donated to the Tri-District School for use in a prairie restoration project. <br />Forty-three percent of Roseville homeowners surveyed arrange a special brush pickup with their <br />garbage hauler. Although some residents don't like that hauler require brush to be cut up before <br />pickup. Twenty-four percent burn their brush in their backyard or fireplace. Fourteen percent <br />chip their own brush, 14% compost it in their backyard and 11% take it to a private company for <br />disposal. The nearest private company is Treecycle near Hamline University. Treecycle does not <br />require brush be cut up before it is dropped off. <br />Illegal dumping of brush on City property does not appear to be a problem in Roseville. Accord- <br />ing to Streets Supervisor Steve Zweber and Park Maintenance Supervisor Ken Hoxmeier City <br />crews deal with 6-12 cases of illega] dumping (including brush, furniture, tires and appliances) <br />on City property each year. That brush is chipped and made available at the leaf compost site. <br />However Permits Coordinator pon Munson and Code Enforcement Officer Rick Talbot say <br />illegal storage of brush and large items on people's property is a significant problem. <br />What Other Cities Do About Brush <br />Neighboring communities offer brush drop off as part of their community clean up days. <br />Shoreview even conducts extra brush drop off days. Residents of these communities are charged <br />66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.