Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix B <br />Pros and Cons of Rec clin Pro ams <br />Pros Cons <br />OPTION 1 --Residents are familiar with it --Participation rates and toru�ages are <br />stagnant <br />Current --Less residual and out throw <br />System --Higher colIection cost <br />--Lower grocessing cost <br />--Dif�culty of getting bins to the curb <br />--Bins ca.i3 be modi�ed to add lids and <br />wheels --Storage concerns inhibiting fizll <br />participation <br />--Lowest cos# ($2.05 per household, <br />per manth} <br />OPTION 2 --Abates storage concerns because of --Difficulty of getting bins to the curb <br />less build up <br />Weekly --Higher collection cost <br />Collection --Less residual and oul throws <br />--Less convenient <br />--Lower processing cost <br />--Increased truck traffic <br />--Bins can be modi .fied to add lids and <br />wheels --88% of residents surveyed said every <br />other week collection is often enough <br />--Higher Cost ($2.10-2.25 per household, <br />er rnonth) <br />OPTION 3 --Convenient (no sorting} --Higher cost of processing <br />Single --Whecled and covered containers --Higher residual and out throw rates <br />Stream <br />--Lower cost of coilection --Only one vendor <br />--Provides additiQnal storage space --If City doesn't own bins, it would have to <br />huy a new set if it changes vendors <br />--Less truck traffic because trucks <br />don't fill as quickly since they can --Waste Management has less incentive to <br />connpact material recover glass and sell it to a manufacturer <br />for recycling <br />--Higher participation <br />--Residents surveyed split 50/50 on whether <br />--More tonnage collected they want it <br />--Highest cost ($225 per household per <br />month) <br />