My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_1120
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_1120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:43:07 AM
Creation date
12/6/2006 5:31:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/27/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session -11/20/06 <br />Minutes - Page 7 <br /> <br />City reserves to use; funding sources available for single-family <br />neighborhoods; and availability of the Housing Resource Center. <br /> <br />Ms. Shay requested the Council's consideration of the petition <br />request as they discuss the policy perspective; and recognize the <br />need of small complexes that cannot come up with the $3 <br />Million to bond for improvements; and asked that they keep that <br />in mind during their deliberations. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the Public Hearing would be held on <br />December 18, 2006 at the regular City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka requested that Ms. Bennett identifY <br />and provide information on other funding options and/or possible <br />private funding options for associations as discussed. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Discuss Public Policy on Lot Splits <br />Community Development Director John Stark provided a <br />detailed summary of existing subdivision regulations as they <br />apply to single-family residential properties; a description of <br />where subdividable lots were located within the City; influence <br />of lot size on community character; larger City policy <br />implications of changing single-family residential lot <br />subdivisions; and other potential regulation options. Mr. Stark <br />noted four areas of concentration of larger lots (i.e., Acorn Road; <br />Gluek Lane; Lake Josephine; and Lake Owasso), consisting of <br />approximately 85properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark identified policy implications that included: housing <br />affordability; increase of housing stock; property taxes; diversity <br />of housing stock; property-owner rights and expectations; <br />property values; and preservation of Open Space. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark provided several potential lot split options including: <br />1) maintaining existing single-family residential <br />zoning/subdivision code; 2) revising the single-family residential <br />code/subdivision code; 3) creation of a neighborhood <br />conservation overlay; or 4) establishing a large-lot zoning <br />district. <br /> <br />Discussion included age definitions for subdivisions and <br /> <br />Discuss <br />Public Policy <br />Lot Splits <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.