My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_1127
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_1127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:43:10 AM
Creation date
12/6/2006 5:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/20/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />\....<"' <br /> <br />WE HAD A DREAM <br />November 27, 2007 <br /> <br />Back in 2001, we in Roseville had a dream. It was a dream to redevelop <br />170 acres of trucking and industrial property with desirable access to the Twin <br />Cities into a business park. This business park was going to have grand 4-5 <br />story office buildings, a 300 bed hospital, medical offices, condos and <br />townhouses around Langton Lake, and a mix of business services on the corner <br />of C and Cleveland, a nice hotel, a great fitness center, perhaps a day care center, <br />and so on. Then on the eastside of Fairview we were going to have hi- tech <br />facilities with good paying jobs, more housing, and so forth. A Master Plan was <br />created to give developers a plan to follow and to make the dream come true. <br />Well, here it is, five years later and guess what? Nothing has happened! Our <br />dream didn't materialize. We had one possible development, but it didn't follow <br />the 2001 Master Plan. Neighbors opposed it. So it didn't fly. <br /> <br />Now we have another proposal, put forth by Rottlund. It only develops <br />around 50 acres, but it would be a good start. The master plan calls for an office <br />business park, and the Rottlund proposal is basically a housing project. So, in my <br />opinion, it's not going to fly either --- Unless we adjust our Master Plan to fit the <br />Rottlund proposal. That will require amending the master plan, and that will <br />require four votes. I believe the developer and land owners need and deserve a <br />new master plan that will give them certainty they can safely proceed. <br /> <br />It's time to create a new master plan that will take in what may be do-able, <br />and yet keep the neighbors happy. I think a housing project would keep most of <br />the neighbors happy. It would certainly cut way down on traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.