My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_1128
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_1128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:43:12 AM
Creation date
12/7/2006 9:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/28/2006
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Special City Council Meeting -11/28/06 <br />Minutes - Page 5 <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon advised that, while the salaries listed in the application <br />materials were comparable for both candidates, she would <br />confirm that data with their current employers; noting that <br />Councilmembers had expressed their individual preferences as to <br />a salary range, as advertised. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust referenced the written City Attorney <br />Memorandum dated November 27, 2006, entitled, "Open Meeting <br />Law - Individual Contract Negotiations," and opined her support <br />for moving forward to appoint a Council Committee to negotiate <br />the contract with the candidate upon their acceptance of the <br />position in order to make the best deal for the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough attempted to outline his specific contract <br />preferences; however, Mayor Klausing suggested that discussing <br />specifics at this time may be premature. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Pust's <br />suggestions to appoint a subcommittee to negotiate the contract <br />and allow for more flexibility; with the subcommittee returning to <br />the City Council with the negotiated contract for full Council <br />approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon had prepared a draft resolution for Council <br />consideration authorizing the establishment of a Committee; with <br />City Attorney Anderson having reviewed the resolution, noting <br />that the committee had no authority to bind the City Council, but <br />were authorized to negotiate the contract, contingent upon City <br />Council approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan clarified that the committee would engage <br />in negotiations for a base line contract; but if areas were <br />encountered that had not been previously agreed upon, they would <br />return to the full City Council for further discussion and <br />consensus. <br /> <br />City Attorney further detailed the process recommended in his <br />memorandum; noting that one person on the Committee would <br />take the responsibility to contact each individual Councilmember <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.